<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fielding Critiques On Luxury VolunTourism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.voluntourism.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.voluntourism.org/?p=188</link>
	<description>Answers To Your VolunTourism Questions &#38; More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:00:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Hill</title>
		<link>http://blog.voluntourism.org/?p=188&#038;cpage=1#comment-4445</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voluntourism.org/?p=188#comment-4445</guid>
		<description>It is indeed a good thing that the debate is happening, and there are legitimate arguments on both sides.
From my perspective, it largely boils down to:
- is there ongoing consultation with the host communities to assess (1) if they would like to have volunteers, and if so (2) what their felt needs are (rather than imposing on the community what we feel should be done there)
- are the host communities actually benefiting from the volunteers? This needs to be examined from a long-term perspective to see if a culture of dependence is being created, or a culture of skills learning and improved self-worth.

It is hard work, and not all volunteer project providers get it right, which is where criticism, and, I believe, a Code of Practice is necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is indeed a good thing that the debate is happening, and there are legitimate arguments on both sides.<br />
From my perspective, it largely boils down to:<br />
- is there ongoing consultation with the host communities to assess (1) if they would like to have volunteers, and if so (2) what their felt needs are (rather than imposing on the community what we feel should be done there)<br />
- are the host communities actually benefiting from the volunteers? This needs to be examined from a long-term perspective to see if a culture of dependence is being created, or a culture of skills learning and improved self-worth.</p>
<p>It is hard work, and not all volunteer project providers get it right, which is where criticism, and, I believe, a Code of Practice is necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s TIME for Some Serious Voluntourism</title>
		<link>http://blog.voluntourism.org/?p=188&#038;cpage=1#comment-4439</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s TIME for Some Serious Voluntourism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voluntourism.org/?p=188#comment-4439</guid>
		<description>[...] transactions involved, David Clemmons (see TI100 profile), founder of Voluntourism.org, is much less cynical about luxury voluntourism, and says that &#8220;it is difficult for me to be critical of activities [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] transactions involved, David Clemmons (see TI100 profile), founder of Voluntourism.org, is much less cynical about luxury voluntourism, and says that &#8220;it is difficult for me to be critical of activities [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
